Hell bent on jumping from one drama to another? Fine by me.
I've come to the conclusion that you're incapable of interpreting texts, either out of incompetence, or malice. If it's the former, you should consider why are you being outclassed by a mentally ill foreigner that last studied the language 15-some years ago, start working on your English, and step up your game. If it's the latter, you should really stop misrepresenting my words if you want to keep conversing, as people generally don't have the patience to keep jumping from one strawman to another. I know I certainly don't.
Regardless, let's go:>Considering that she can't hear you for a moment
What does that even have to do with anything? Are you implying I don't have the balls to say that to her? I do. Of course the delivery would be different, as the recipient is different, but the content and intention would be preserved. I would explain to her, very affectionately so, that she should not look to expose herself too much and avoid overt sexualization, as she stands to gain nothing from it, and being a classy wholesome girl is the best for her in the long run.
Talking about delivery, on the board, I called her a "semi-slut" which to me meant she shows behaviour that can be sometimes interpreted as slutty, but not with sufficient actual evidence of her personal sexual habits to actively declare her as a slut, a whore. There is an important difference here and I think that was very clear for everyone to see but you.>Part of loving someone is preserving who they are
Agreed. And I said exactly that on my previous post, as acceptance implies preservation, or the very least non-interference. If only you had read it.>and standing up against those that would do them harm
And how do you suggest I do that without falling into platitudes, really? All I can do for now is to defend her online. Which I do. I really do. If you had less of a selective reading and some undisclosed quarrel against me, you'd acknowledge that I've stood by her, here and elsewhere, countless times already, and other girls as well, for that matter. However, to defend something or someone is to correct injustices derived from misunderstandings and misconceptions, NOT ignoring flaws. Zhenya IS over-sexualized, it doesn't detract from her positives, which are many
, but there is no other way around this reality either.
(You shouldn't really be taking issue on this. Instead you should be considering what is the>cause
of that).>Anonymously slandering a child that you claim to love is far from that, it's disgusting and you should be ashamed of yourself for it.
Not a child, and you know it. Not that anonymous, and you know it as well. Even then, what difference does it make? If I had a name, so what? That still wouldn't be tied to my real person/identity. Do you think you have any accountability here because there is a (Cake) written on the top of your post? Do you think it's worth more? Its contents more valuable? Get real. You should be looking at content, not labels. Also, why is it exactly that all my compliments and tender posts over her seem to not count and get completely ignored, yet you're making a case on this (one) post? Could it be you're just bored and just want to be a fucking irrit?>Not an unexpected move, attack my love for my son for questioning the nasty things you say about a little girl that you've never met.
Again, were you be able to read and understand what people say to you, you'd see that statement was rhetorical and I explained in the VERY NEXT SENTENCE why that is. An unfair answer to an unfair question to begin with, as you cannot quantify a feeling and you cannot presume to know what goes on inside other people's minds. Therefore, much in the same way I cannot possibly know the extent of your love for your son – and to question that in the first place is unfair - neither should you question mine. How can I possibly make this any clearer?